Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Sterling v. Lumpkin
as 24-20155
Petitioner:
Larry Donal Sterling
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00344
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Edwards v. Jackson
as 1:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Donal R. Edwards
Defendant:
Heath Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Jonathan Cocco v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Adam Jonathan Cocco
Defendant:
County of Orange, Orange County Sheriffs Department, Donal Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Thompson et al
as 1:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Donal R. Edwards
Defendant:
Chance Thompson and Dewey Bondurant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Donal R. Edwards
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Escambia County Corrections
as 1:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Donal R. Edwards
Defendant:
Escambia County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Escambia County District Court
as 1:2022cv00455
Petitioner:
Donal R. Edwards
Respondent:
Escambia County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Edwards v. Escambia County Sheriff Department
as 1:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Donal Ray Edwards
Defendant:
Escambia County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. State Alabama
as 1:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
Donal R. Edwards
Defendant:
State Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
