Cases 1 - 9 of 9
John Moss v. Corizon CMS, et al
as 15-1382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John T. Moss
Defendant - Appellee:
Corizon CMS, Medical provider, Arkansas Department of Correction, Arkansas Department of Correction, State Prison, Corizon, Inc. and others
Robert Soto v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 14-1119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Shawn Soto
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Larry D. May, Assistant Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Grant Harris, Assistant Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Duncan v. Lay et al
as 5:2013cv00386
Plaintiff:
Richard Duncan
Defendant:
Gaylon Lay, Jared K Byers, Donald Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Warner et al
as 5:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Byron L Wallace
Defendant:
Mark Warner, Charlie Walker, Larry May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvey v. Lay et al
as 5:2012cv00429
Plaintiff:
Sidney Harvey
Defendant:
Gaylon Lay, Mark Warner, Donald Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2010cv00212
Plaintiff:
Robert Soto
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry D May, Grant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shannon Boyle v. Gaylon Lay, et al
as 10-1235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shannon David Boyle
Defendant - Appellee:
Gaylon Lay, Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC, Vernon R. Robertson, Major, Cummins Unit, ADC, Donald Tate, Captain, Cummins Unit, ADC and others
Croston v. Norris et al
as 5:2009cv00373
Plaintiff:
Detrick DeShawn Croston
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Ray Hobbs, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyle v. Lay et al
as 5:2009cv00279
Plaintiff:
Shannon Boyle
Defendant:
Gaylon Lay, Vernon Robertson, Donald Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
