Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Bocook v. Eddie et al
as 7:2023cv00614
Plaintiff:
Daryl D. Bocook
Defendant:
Dr. Eddie and Annette Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merrick v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2021cv04803
Plaintiff:
Bret S Merrick
Defendant:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution, Dr Eddy, Dr Capers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penick v. Ohio Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv03331
Defendant:
Warden David Gray, Aramark Corp., ADA Coordinator and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Penick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geraci v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv01875
Defendant:
Unknown Medical Staff, M Weaver, Regina Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Romeo Geraci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bismillah v. Bureau of Medical Services et al
as 3:2018cv02741
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Stuart Hudson, Bureau of Medical Services and others
Plaintiff:
Bismillah and Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graber v. Eddy et al
as 3:2018cv02267
Plaintiff:
John S. Graber
Defendant:
Dr. Eddy, John Gardner, Roger Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections-Central Office et al
as 3:2018cv01769
Defendant:
Karen Stanforth, Lisa Petersen, Dr Cataldi and others
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wineinger v. Mohr et al
as 3:2017cv01726
Plaintiff:
Thomas David Wineinger
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, N. Turner, Dr. Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Oklahoma County Jail et al
as 5:2016cv01211
Plaintiff:
Quashara K Harmon
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Jail, John Whetsel, Dr Eddie Warrior Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. Houglan et al
as 1:2016cv00852
Plaintiff:
Timothy Simms
Defendant:
Todd Houglan, David Hannah and Dr. Eddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
