Cases 1 - 10 of 99
(PC) Daniel v. Nelson et al
as 2:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Dajon Daniel
Defendant:
E. Bradley Nelson and Malary Getty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victor Thomas v. Martynuska, et al
as 24-1824
Plaintiff:
VICTOR DARNELL THOMAS
Defendant:
R.N. MARTYNUSKA, Medical Contractor, FCI Loretto, NORMAN WEIDLICH, Health Care Administrator, FCI Loretto, M.D. KIM SWINDELL and others
Deleon v. Ayers
as 23-181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason Deleon
Defendant / Appellee:
Joel R. Ayers, John S. Marshall, Joseph E. Bradley and others
Defendant:
Stephen J. Wenderlich
Holloway v. Bradley
as 1:2022cv01289
Petitioner:
Rondell Holloway
Respondent:
Warden E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lawrence, Sr. v. Bradley
as 1:2022cv01113
Petitioner:
Troy Lawrence, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Winston v. Bradley
as 3:2022cv01081
Petitioner:
LeAnthony T. Winston
Respondent:
Warden E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRADLEY v. YORK COUNTY SHERIFF
as 2:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E BRADLEY
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts, Jr. v. Bradley
as 4:2022cv01035
Petitioner:
J.L. Roberts, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRADLEY v. YORK COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 2:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E BRADLEY
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY SHERIFF, PORTLAND CITY POLICE, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Wallace v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00662
Petitioner:
Timmy Wallace
Respondent:
United States of America and E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
