Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6428
Plaintiff:
JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH, a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
David Richardson v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6392
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Virginia Dept. of Corrections, EDDIE L. PEARSON, Lead Warden - Greenville Correctional Center, TAMMY WILLIAMS, Warden, DRCC Correctional Center and others
Hawthorne v. Pearson
as 3:2020cv00764
Respondent:
Eddie L. Pearson
Petitioner:
Derrick Jerome Hawthorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Pearson
as 7:2019cv00100
Plaintiff:
Milton Antoine Brown and Sultan Imanuel El-Bey
Defendant:
Eddie L. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Leroy v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00684
Plaintiff:
Lovelace Leroy and Jose Armas
Defendant:
Vincent Gore, M.D., J. Cutchin, S. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fred Johnson v. Eddie Pearson
as 18-6515
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRED LEE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
EDDIE L. PEARSON, (Warden) Greenville Correctional Center
Hawkins v. Clarke et al
as 3:2018cv00276
Plaintiff:
John Arthur Hawkins
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Rose Durbin, Eddie L. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Clarke et al
as 3:2018cv00274
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Smith
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Rose Durbin, Eddie L. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edgar v. Clarke et al
as 3:2018cv00273
Plaintiff:
John Leroy Edgar
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Rose Durbin, Eddie L. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melnyczyn v. Clarke et al
as 3:2018cv00275
Plaintiff:
Thomas Patrick Melnyczyn
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Rose Durbin, Eddie L. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
