Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Burl et al
as 2:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
Charles A Winston
Defendant:
Danny Burl, Dexter Payne, Todd Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Dawson et al
as 2:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
Maurice Green
Defendant:
Connie Dawson, Ester Petti, Todd Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen et al v. Bass et al
as 4:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Allen and Marjorie LeClair
Defendant:
Ester Bass, Annette Bonds, Judy Clay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Stewart et al
as 2:2012cv00235
Plaintiff:
Charles A Winston
Defendant:
Charles Stewart, Lathan Ester, Danny Burl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chance v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2012cv00228
Plaintiff:
Franklin L Chance
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry May, Lisa Wilkens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. Cody et al
as 2:2012cv00198
Plaintiff:
Gregory A McElroy
Defendant:
T Cody, L Ester, Danny Burl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deaton v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 2:2012cv00186
Plaintiff:
Christopher Deaton
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Ray Hobbs, Larry Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Andrews et al
as 2:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Michael L Thomas
Defendant:
Jeremy Andrews, Todd Ball, Danny Burl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
