Cases 1 - 10 of 30
GENOVESE v. WARDEN FCI TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2023cv00455
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS GENOVESE
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MURPHY v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00152
Petitioner:
JAMES PATRICK MURPHY
Respondent:
T. RULE and FCI TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BURNLEY v. FCC TERRE HAUTE HEALTH SERVICES UNIT et al
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
WALTER BURNLEY
Defendant:
FCC TERRE HAUTE HEALTH SERVICES UNIT, FCI OXFORD HEALTH SER and KWAME GYASI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
KIEFFE SR v. FCI TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KIEFFE SR
Defendant:
FCI TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SELLS v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00026
Petitioner:
JEROMEE SELLS
Respondent:
T. RULE and FCI TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CLINKENBEARD v. FCI TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CLINKENBEARD
Defendant:
FCI TERRE HAUTE, J BALLARD and COLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JOHNSON v. TERRE HAUTE FCI
as 2:2022cv00180
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Respondent:
TERRE HAUTE FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BUNTON v. FCI TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
PAUL BUNTON
Defendant:
FCI TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PEREZ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv00356
Plaintiff:
CARLOS PEREZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNKNOWN WARDEN OF TERRE HAUTE FCI, UNKNOWN FOOD SERVICES SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHAPPELL v. RHODES et al
as 2:2020cv00686
Defendant:
UNKNOWN FCI DENTIST, RHODES and VAN WAGNER
Plaintiff:
BRYAN COLBY CHAPPELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
