Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Francisco Ruiz, Jr. v. Rodney Reynolds
as 24-1782
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ RUIZ, JR.
Defendant:
RODNEY REYNOLDS
Cruz, Francisco v. Yermish et al
as 1:2024cv21549
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz and Francisco Rodriguez-Cruz
Defendant:
Steven Yermish and Martin Public Defender Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARAJAS v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv20101
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ BARAJAS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Francisco Ruiz, Jr. v. Wayne Bauer, et al
as 23-2539
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ RUIZ, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WAYNE BAUER, STANIEC, NP RN BLEEKER and others
(HC) Rodriguez-Cardona v. FCI Mendota Warden
as 1:2023cv00953
Petitioner:
Francisco Rodriguez-Cardona
Respondent:
FCI Mendota Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodriguez Ruiz v. Regenolds
as 1:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Ruiz, Jr
Defendant:
Sgt Regenolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez Ruiz v. Bauer et al
as 1:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Ruiz, Jr
Defendant:
Capt Wayne Bauer, Lt Staniec, NP RN Bleeker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez Ruiz v. Wierenga
as 1:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Ruiz, Jr
Defendant:
Cpt C Cruz, Cpt Sanchez, CO II Jordan Wierenga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez-Saldana v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2022cv00014
Petitioner:
Francisco Rodriguez-Saldana
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rodriguez Cruz v. Jones
as 4:2021cv10026
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Defendant:
Mark H. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
