Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv03130
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. JONES et al
as 4:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Defendant:
Jones, STARLING, COFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Frederick Douglas Dixon
Defendant:
Jones, Starling, Cofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. JONES et al
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Defendant:
Warden JONES, JONES, MOHAMMED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. JONES et al
as 4:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Defendant:
Warden JONES, Warden WISZ, Nurse JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. JONES et al
as 4:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Defendant:
Warden JONES, Former Warden BLACK, MS HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOUGLAS v. FCI LORETTO, WARDEN
as 3:2019cv00076
Petitioner:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS
Respondent:
FCI LORETTO, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Douglas v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas, III
Defendant:
Edwin Hubbard, Troy J. Peterson, Unknown Immel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Dixon v. Warden, et al
as 17-10420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, GRIMES, Education/Vocation Director, Baldwin CI, SMITH, Unit Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
