Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Hatcher v. Lovejoy Correctional Facility
as 2:2023cv01735
Plaintiff:
Jamarcus Dewayne Hatcher
Defendant:
Lovejoy Correctional Facility, Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility and Geo Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Jamarcus Dewayne Hatcher
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, Officer Macfallen, Officer Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Cruz et al
as 2:2022cv00569
Plaintiff:
Charles William Hatcher, Jr
Defendant:
Isaac Cruz, Lara M Alvis, Jill Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00808
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lamar Hatcher and Doo Doo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hatcher v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00268
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lamar Hatcher
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hatcher v. Olson et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Wally Olson, Steve Baxley and Ron Nelson
Plaintiff:
A. J. Hatcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Crow et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Hatcher
Defendant:
John Crow and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hatcher v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00737
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lamar Hatcher
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hatcher v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv08031
Petitioner:
Donell Hatcher
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
