Cases 1 - 10 of 10
TAYLOR v. HUBER et al
as 1:2022cv02070
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MACK TAYLOR
Defendant:
HUBER and SHELLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Tippecanoe County Jail Administration et al
as 4:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Tracy Regan Hopkins
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County Jail Administration, Robert Goldsmith, Tom Lehmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS v. ALL MEDICAL DOCTORS & STAFF NURSES et al
as 1:2022cv01254
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY L. COLLINS
Defendant:
ALL MEDICAL DOCTORS & STAFF NURSES, HUBER, Sergeant ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. All Medical Doctors & Staff Nurses et al
as 3:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Collins
Defendant:
All Medical Doctors & Staff Nurses, Huber, Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. COY et al
as 1:2019cv03820
Defendant:
JAMIE COY, DAVID YOUNG, ANGEL PETTY and others
Plaintiff:
KEANDRE ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORINGTON v. ZOLEY et al
as 2:2019cv00336
Plaintiff:
LAKESHA NORINGTON and SHAWNTRELL NORINGTON
Defendant:
GEORGE C. ZOLEY, NOAH SNIDER, DOUGLAS ADKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NORINGTON v. ZOLEY et al
as 1:2019cv01185
Defendant:
KRUL, GEORGE C. ZOLEY, M. LOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
LAKESHA NORINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. SPRAKS et al
as 1:2019cv01053
Defendant:
J. SMITH, M. SMITH, SPRAKS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON et al v. DAUSS et al
as 1:2019cv00225
Defendant:
DAUSS, WEXFORD MEDICAL PROVIDERS, HUBER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON, JEANEATTE JACKSON and KELVIN JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. CANNIFF et al
as 1:2018cv02499
Defendant:
BUTT, LATOUR, SCHURMAN and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
