Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Waltermeyer v. Hazlewood, et al
as 24-1355
Plaintiff:
BROC T. WALTERMEYER
Defendant:
DIANE L. KISLER, RICHARD A. LUNA, Warden, FCI Berlin, ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, Warden, FCI Berlin and others
Winkleman v. Hazlewood
as 23-1942
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN F. WINKLEMAN, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, Warden, FCI Berlin
Birdow v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Austin D. Birdow
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and C.F. Hazlewood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DiGrazia v. Hazlewood
as 23-1050
Petitioner / Appellant:
GUY PHILLIP DIGRAZIA
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, Warden, FCI Berlin
Demison v. Hazlewood et al
as 9:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Robert Demison, III
Defendant:
C.F. Hazlewood and J. Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Krieg v. Hazlewood
as 22-1717
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC KRIEG
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, Warden, FCI Berlin
Winkelman v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2022fp00282
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden and Robert Hazlewood
Petitioner:
John F. Winkelman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
El v. Hazlewood, et al
as 22-1585
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAAME AMUN RE EL
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU MELANSON, Mailroom Officer, FCI Berlin, in his individual capacity and official capacity, FNU FLYNN, Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, in his individual capacity and official capacity, FNU FARREN, Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, in his individual capacity and official capacity and others
Defendant:
ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, Warden, FCI Berlin
Grohoske et al v. STATE OF TEXAS et al
as 6:2022cv00818
Plaintiff:
David Lester Grohoske, Roy Lester Grohoske and Diann Hazlewood Grohoske
Defendant:
STATE OF TEXAS, Sheriff Joe Lopez, Medical Examiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Izlar v. Hazlewood
as 22-1457
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES IZLAR, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, Warden, FCI - Berlin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
