Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Randall v. Oneil et al
as 9:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Carl Randall and Jarrod C. Randall
Defendant:
Colleen M. Oneil, Brian R. McDermott, Peter R. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Sullivan
as 22-3064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Allen Rogers Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
Ann Marie T. Sullivan, Commissioner of Mental Health, Daniell Dill, Acting Executive Director for Deborah McCulloch, Executive Director Central New York Psychiatric Center, Mr. Jamie Temple, Chief for Security, CNYPC and others
Scott v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Allen Rogers Scott
Defendant:
Ann Marie T. Sullivan, Daniell Dill, Mr. Jamie Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv05017
Plaintiff:
Jerrel Johnson
Defendant:
Washington Department of Corrections, Mary Brandt, Debbra Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glass v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2019cv00051
Defendant:
New Vista of the Bluegrass, Inc., Puller, Jiminez and others
Not Yet Classified:
Leslie Glass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hedger v. Wexford et al
as 3:2018cv02081
Defendant:
St. Clair County Jail, Dr. Larson, Wexford and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Hedger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hedger v. Williams
as 3:2014cv00940
Petitioner:
Daniel Gregory Hedger
Respondent:
Tarry Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ledcke v. Kelton et al
as 5:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
Shawn Ledcke
Defendant:
Zachary J. Kelton, Jason Torres, Lisa M. Suderman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Marvin Hedger v. Johanna Smith
as 12-35773
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARVIN DEE HEDGER
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHANNA SMITH
Hedger v. Mathews et al
as 1:2011cv01051
Plaintiff:
Daniel G Hedger
Defendant:
Jose Mathews, Joseph Mathy, Guy Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
