Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Hodges v. Graef et al
as 4:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Octavious Hodges
Defendant:
John Graef and Dallas County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Hodges et al
as 4:2023cv04044
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
T Hodges, Deputy Warden J. Miners, Former Officer Brinkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Hodges et al
as 4:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
T Hodges, J Miners, Brinkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woolfolk v. Holiman et al
as 4:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
Torrey Valone Woolfolk
Defendant:
James Tyler Holiman, Kim Doney, Robert Wakefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. Dallas County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2022cv00773
Plaintiff:
Octavious Hodges
Defendant:
Dallas County Sheriff's Department, Does Deputies, Dallas County Sheriff's Department, Sam Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilliam v. Hodge et al
as 4:2020cv01053
Defendant:
Hall, Matthew Hodge, John Staley and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Gilliam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Voss v. Hodge et al
as 4:2020cv00812
Defendant:
Devore, Hodge and Steffen
Plaintiff:
Raymey Voss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Hodge et al
as 4:2020cv04046
Defendant:
Warden T. Maxwell, Deputy Warden J. Miners, Tina Hodge and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daniel Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elrod v. Lonoke County Detention Center et al
as 4:2020cv00288
Defendant:
Juarez, Lonoke County Detention Center, Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Mitchell Elrod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatton v. Hodge et al
as 4:2020cv00024
Defendant:
Berryman, Margie Grigsby, Hodge and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Hatton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
