Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Vanderford v. Schnell et al
as 0:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
Zhi Kai H. Vanderford
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Michelle L. Smith, Kathryn Halvorson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Birkholz et al
as 0:2021cv02017
Petitioner:
Anthony Johnson and Darnell Hughes
Respondent:
B. Birkholz and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Allan v. Hebert et al
as 0:2021cv00166
Defendant:
Daniel Maki, James Berg, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Birkholz et al
as 0:2020cv02190
Petitioner:
DaQuan Tyson, Robert Porter, Andre Wilborn and others
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal and B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McGowan v. Birkholz
as 0:2019cv02913
Petitioner:
Hugh L. McGowan
Respondent:
Warden Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilson v. Fikes
as 0:2019cv01942
Petitioner:
Robert Hugh Wilson
Respondent:
Warden Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Muhammad v. United States (FTCA) et al
as 0:2019cv01750
Defendant:
G. Kendal Hughes, Any & All Other Officials Discovered by Discovery, John Doe Bengston and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daywitt et al v. Volunteer Services Department et al
as 0:2019cv01632
Defendant:
Nick Lammi, Chad Mesojedec, Volunteer Services Department and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Hughes and Kenneth Daywitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loving El et al v. Minnesota Dept. of Corr. et al
as 0:2019cv00707
Defendant:
Dornbach, J. Doeden, Kathryn Halvorson and others
Plaintiff:
Lovell N. Oates El and Ronelle R. Loving El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biron v. Hurwitz et al
as 0:2019cv00057
Defendant:
Deanna Hiller, Hugh Hurwitz and Nanette Barnes
Plaintiff:
Lisa A. Biron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
