Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ROOKS v. SMITH et al
as 4:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Defendant:
TOMMY SMITH, SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON CO., TERRY E. BAMARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROOKS v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv01727
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J. ROOKS
Defendant:
TOMMY SMITH, SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON CO., TERRY E. BAMARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurbert v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00046
Petitioner:
Clester Randy Hurbert
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Pfister et al
as 1:2018cv04342
Plaintiff:
Cord E Harris
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Counselor Williams, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luis Garces v. J. Pickett, et al
as 17-15655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS M. GARCES
Defendant - Appellee:
J. PICKETT, Associate Warden at High Desert State Prison, BARTON, Correctional Officer at High Desert State Prison, SCHAAKE, Correctional Officer at High Desert State Prison and others
Garces v. Pickett et al
as 2:2017cv00319
Plaintiff:
Luis Manuel Garces
Defendant:
J. Pickett, Barton, Schaake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garces v. Pickett et al
as 1:2017cv00190
Plaintiff:
Luis Manuel Garces
Defendant:
J. Pickett, Barton, Schaake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary v. Reed
as 16-3711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hurbert Cary
Defendant - Appellee:
Duane Reed and Mr. Simmons
Cary v. Reed et al
as 1:2016cv06299
Plaintiff:
Hurbert Cary
Defendant:
Duane Reed and Mr. Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston v. Fisher et al
as 3:2015cv00486
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Johnston
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Christopher Epps, Jerry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
