Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Adonnis Shepheard, Sr. v. Shelby Searls
as 24-6451
Plaintiff:
ADONNIS R. SHEPHEARD, SR.
Defendant:
SHELBY SEARLS, Warden, JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer, JANE DOE, Nurse and others
Elan Bell-Veney v. Shelby Searls
as 22-7423
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELAN BELL-VENEY
Respondent / Appellee:
SHELBY SEARLS, Superintendent, Huttonsville Correctional Center
Antonio Collins v. Shelby Searls
as 22-6900
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTONIO COLLINS
Respondent / Appellee:
SHELBY SEARLS, Superintendent, Huttonsville Correctional Center
Shepheard v. Huttonsville Correctional Center et al
as 3:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Adonnis R. Shepheard, Sr.
Defendant:
Huttonsville Correctional Center, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aron Freeland v. Shelby Searls
as 22-6109
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARON FREELAND
Respondent / Appellee:
SHELBY SEARLS, Superintendent
Respondent:
WARDEN, Huttonsville Correctional Center
Antrobius v. Huttonsville Correctional Center
as 5:2021cv00198
Petitioner:
Frank Antrobius
Respondent:
Huttonsville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hairston v. Huttonsville Correctional Center
as 2:2021cv00509
Petitioner:
Quashawn Hairston
Respondent:
Huttonsville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hoffman v. Warden Huttonsville Correctional Center et al
as 3:2019cv00106
Plaintiff:
David Hoffman
Defendant:
Warden Huttonsville Correctional Center and Steven's Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devine v. Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center
as 5:2018cv00148
Petitioner:
Richard Devine and Richard C. Devine
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Huttonsville and Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riley v. Huttonsville Correctional Center
as 5:2018cv00124
Plaintiff:
Mark Riley
Defendant:
Huttonsville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
