Cases 1 - 10 of 128
(PC) Zinman v. Llamas et al
as 1:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Justin Marcus Zinman Doing business as American Media Intelligence
Defendant:
P. Llamas, J. Sherman, Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITAKER v. YEADON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
DAMION D. WHITAKER
Defendant:
YEADON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER JENNA LONG, OFFICER NICHOLAS FOKONITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. TDCJ
as 24-20097
Plaintiff:
William Scott Garrison
Defendant:
TDCJ Mail Grievance Department, Alfred Hughes Unit Grievance Department, Bambi Kiser, TDCJ Media Officer and others
McGillvary v. Rolling Stone, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv10428
Plaintiff:
Caleb L. McGillvary
Defendant:
Rolling Stone, LLC, Marlow Stern and Wenner Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 as Fed. Question: Assault, Libel, Slander
Pagan v. Midhudson Forensic Psychiatric Hospital et al
as 1:2023cv10050
Plaintiff:
Jerry Pagan
Defendant:
Midhudson Forensic Psychiatric Hospital, Kirby Hospital, Media Public Network and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hunter v. Patterson, et al
as 2:2023cv02376
Plaintiff:
David Hunter and David Sampson Hunter
Defendant:
State Media Perpetrators, Rick Alfread Mandeville, Scott Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Patterson, et al
as 4:2023cv04917
Plaintiff:
David Hunter
Defendant:
State Media Perpetrators, Rick Alfread Mandeville, Scott Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shawn Barth v. Jared Lazano, et al
as 23-15897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN DAMON BARTH
Defendant / Appellee:
JARED D. LAZANO, Warden, BROWN, Captain, I.S.U LOPEZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
