Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Steven Riddick v. Barry Mullins
as 23-6670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN RIDDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
BARRY MULLINS, Correctional Officer and Z. M. MANNON, Sergeant
Defendant:
JEFFERY B. KISER, Warden, LARRY COLLINS, Unit Manager, C. MESSER, Correctional Officer and others
David Meyers v. Walter Swiney
as 23-6402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WALTER SWINEY, Unit Manager, D. C. STALLARD and M. L. COUNTS
Defendant:
U. S. POSTAL SERVICE, J. GIBSON, P. SYLKES and others
Steven Riddick v. Barry Mullins
as 23-6392
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN RIDDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
BARRY MULLINS, Correctional Officer and Z. M. MANNON, Sergeant
Defendant:
JEFFERY B. KISER, Warden, LARRY COLLINS, Unit Manager, C. MESSER, Correctional Officer and others
David Meyers v. B. Dye
as 22-6785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
B. DYE, R. BISHOP, S. YOUNG and others
Meyers v. Dye et al
as 7:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
B. Dye, R. Bishop, S. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00558
Defendant:
AW Anderson, Prison Guard Cox, AW Combs and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00496
Defendant:
W. Harber, W. Swiney, C. Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00406
Defendant:
Ulm Collins, Hawkins, Walter Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Sargent et al
as 7:2019cv00002
Defendant:
U/M-Collins, Assistant Attorney General Charisse Mullen, W. Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Dye et al
as 2:2018cv00616
Defendant:
R. Walz, U/M Duncan, W. Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
