Cases 1 - 10 of 13
DIGGS v. BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv04827
Defendant:
WARDEN OF B.C.C.F., JOHN DOE #2,, OFC. F. WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBIN J. DIGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbin v. Bucks County et al
as 2:2023cv02784
Plaintiff:
Valeria Corbin
Defendant:
Bucks County, David Kratz, James Coyne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coyne v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2023cv00700
Petitioner:
James Coyne
Respondent:
Commissioner Ann Marie T. Sullivan and New York State Office of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughan v. Grate et al
as 3:2019cv00177
Defendant:
Jonathon Grate, Ashley Short, Chris Kleymeyer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Coyne et al
as 3:2018cv00631
Defendant:
James Coyne, Misty Hair, Parole Officer Excelle and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallory v. Smith et al
as 3:2017cv00253
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Mallory
Defendant:
Aaron Smith, Anna Valentine, James Coyne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Coyne et al
as 3:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Jackson
Defendant:
James Coyne, Heather Horn, Unknown Inmate Accounts Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Coyn et al
as 3:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson, II
Defendant:
James Coyn, Strout, Ten Correctional Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yale Balcar, et al v. Kentucky State Reformatory, et al
as 17-5069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YALE LARRY BALCAR and CARL J. PERRY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY STATE REFORMATORY, KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AARON SMITH and others
Balcar et al v. Kentucky State Reformatory et al
as 3:2016cv00687
Plaintiff:
Yale Larry Balcar and Carl J. Perry, Jr.
Defendant:
Kentucky State Reformatory, Kentucky Department of Corrections, Aaron Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
