Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ortiz-Luna v. USA
as 3:2017cv01146
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Ortiz-Luna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Marcus Combs v. Javier Ortiz, et al
as 14-11280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS P. COMBS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAVIER ORTIZ, Deputy in his individual capacity, KRISTA BLUTCHER, Deputy in her individual capacity, THOMPSON, in his individual capacity and others
Combs v. Ortiz et al
as 8:2014cv00436
Defendant:
Javier Ortiz, Krista Blutcher, Deputy Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus P. Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2012cv06399
Petitioner:
JAVIER ORTIZ
Respondent:
LUIS FOLINO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
ORTIZ v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2012cv05979
Petitioner:
JAVIER ORTIZ
Respondent:
LUIS FOLINO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Javier Ortiz v. Commonwealth of PA, et al
as 11-2091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAVIER ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and ATTY GEN PA
Ortiz v. Ercole
as 10-1696
Petitioner - Appellant:
Javier Ortiz
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert E. Ercole, Green Haven Correctional Facility
ORTIZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2010cv01187
Plaintiff:
JAVIER ORTIZ
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2010cv00028
Petitioner:
Javier Ortiz
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Ercole
as 1:2009cv02571
Petitioner:
Javier Ortiz
Respondent:
Robert E. Ercole
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
