Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Webb Jr. v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
William J Webb Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Justice, United States Postal Service, Renee Hrivnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE et al
as 1:2021cv15798
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JONES
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, NAKIA BOWMAN, CONSOLATA MULLI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Doe et al
as 3:2021cv01028
Defendant:
Warden, John and Jane Doe 1-50 and John and/or Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Nelson v. King County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2020cv01293
Defendant:
King County Sheriff's Office, John Does 1-50, Jane Does 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Adrien Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klein, Franklin v. O'Donnell, Cindy et al
as 3:2019cv00887
Defendant:
Chris Buesgen, Anthony Hentz, Jodi Dougherty and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Klein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lough v. County of Columbia et al
as 3:2019cv01697
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Nye, John & Jane Does (1 - 50), Lt. Setzer and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Lough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockett v. City of Middletown et al
as 7:2019cv08255
Defendant:
Orange County, P.O. Trapani, P.O. Nicholas Pesola and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Zuckerberg et al
as 7:2019cv07821
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, PayPal, Prakash Kondepudi and others
Plaintiff:
Casimir P. Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gakuba v. Brown et al
as 1:2019cv05429
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-50 and Dorothy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COVINGTON v. BUCKS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv03062
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAWS, ANTHONY DISANDRO, LIEUTENANT ROBERT GORMAN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES COVINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
