Cases 1 - 10 of 235
Lockhart v. Marley (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Lockhart
Defendant:
Josh Marley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Whittle et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Lockhart
Defendant:
Chris Whittle and Officer Marley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Biden et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Jhamal Dwayne Crawford
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Estate of Joe Nathan James, Jr. v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Joe Nathan James, Jr.
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm, Terry Raybon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carstarphen v. Gillespie et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen and Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Sr.
Defendant:
Kennth Gillespie, Mathew Simpson, Robert H. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
James v. Raybon et al
as 1:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan James, Jr.
Defendant:
Terry Raybon, John Hamm, Julia Jordan Weller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsen v. Turman et al
as 1:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Joe Mitchell Dorsen and Joe Mitchell Dorsey
Defendant:
Blake Turman and Mark Odom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsen v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Joe Mitchell Dorsey
Defendant:
Blake Turman and Mark Odom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Raybon et al
as 1:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan James, Jr.
Defendant:
Terry Raybon, John Hamm and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
