Cases 1 - 10 of 3,566
Gaines v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv02686
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Shawnee Health Care Unit, Darren Galloway and others
Plaintiff:
Taji Gaines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Deel et al
as 1:2024cv07536
Defendant:
John Doe 3, John Doe 2, Gerald Deel and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00521
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1, Brian Collier and others
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Osbourne et al
as 3:2024cv50516
Defendant:
Remmers, Lidoff, Plantz and others
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCloud v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv02643
Defendant:
John Doe 2 and John Doe 1
Plaintiff:
Peter J. McCloud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2024cv09765
Plaintiff:
Mark Watson
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe #1 and P.O. John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Minerly v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv12969
Defendant:
John Lack, Parole Agent Miller, Latoya Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Minerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEFFIELD v. BROWN et al
as 5:2024cv00281
Defendant:
JOHN DOE - 1, MICHAEL BROWN, JOHN DOE - 5 and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE L SHEFFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickert (ID 125871) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv03229
Defendant:
Kevin Goodman, Stacy Heald, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Braden Hickert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pace v. Lamb et al
as 3:2024cv01299
Defendant:
MD Jean Baptiste, John Doe 3, Warden Travis Lamb and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Pace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
