Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Feldpausch v. Rabdia et al
as 3:2024cv03088
Plaintiff:
Ron Feldpausch
Defendant:
. Rabdia, Wexford Medical, . Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Lafvorne Barnett
Defendant:
State of New York, John Dow, J. Wollcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. State of New York et al
as 9:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Lafvorne Barnett
Defendant:
State of New York, John Dow, J. Wollcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tholson v. Dow et al
as 3:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Leon Tholson
Defendant:
John Dow and State of Alaska Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shehan v. Barrone et al
as 3:2022cv00879
Plaintiff:
Joseph Shehan
Defendant:
Barrone, Amaral, Faba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Rockland County Jail Matnice et al
as 7:2022cv02755
Plaintiff:
Lafvorne Levi Barnett
Defendant:
Rockland County Jail Matnice, Tonyi Anglo, Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Inch et al
as 6:2022cv00425
Petitioner:
David Lee Moore
Respondent:
Mark Inch, Lane, John Dow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. INCH et al
as 3:2021cv04821
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE MOORE
Defendant:
MARK INCH, LANE, JOHN DOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. City of New York, et al
as 1:2021cv06718
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Murray and Leviticus Lucfer
Defendant:
N.Y.C. D.O.C., 7 John Dow C.O., 1 Jane Dow Capton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bender v. Santoro et al
as 1:2021cv00448
Defendant:
JT Walker, O. Moncibiaz, Destiny Morales and others
Plaintiff:
Floyd Eugene Bender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
