Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Soliz v. Nueces County
as 24-40353
Plaintiff: Jesus Soliz
Defendant: Nueces County, Armar Correctional Healthcare Services, Roberto Cano and others
Gayden v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00679
Petitioner: John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
John Gayden, Jr. v. USA
as 24-11074
Petitioner: JOHN MATTHEW GAYDEN, JR.
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Gayden, Jr. v. USA
as 24-10037
Petitioner: JOHN MATTHEW GAYDEN, JR.
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Matthews v. USA
as 3:2023cv01199
Petitioner: John Matthews
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Soliz v. Nueces County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00107
Plaintiff: Jesus Soliz
Defendant: Nueces County, Sheriff John Hooper, Armar Correctional Healthcare Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tremonti Perry v. Anne Precythe, et al
as 23-1455
Plaintiff / Appellant: Tremonti Perry
Defendant / Appellee: Anne L. Precythe, Ian Wallace, Warden, Southeast Missouri Correctional Center, Corizon LLC and others
Keeling v. Garnett Hospitality et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00466
Plaintiff: Brandon Keeling
Defendant: Garnett Hospitality, Commonwealth Hotels, Allianz Global and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayden v. Sackler Family We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05918
Plaintiff: John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Defendant: Sackler Family
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayden v. Sala
as 8:2022cv01058
Plaintiff: John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Defendant: Eva Sala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?