Cases 1 - 10 of 166
Wells v. Palmer et al
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
William Edward Wells, III
Defendant:
John Palmer, Barry Reddish, Kevin Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Little, Jr. v. John Palmer
as 24-6516
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTONIO LITTLE, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN PALMER, Warden, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director, T. ROBERTSON, Assistant Warden and others
Victoria v. Kimbrell et al
as 5:2024cv01441
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamar Victoria
Defendant:
Coata Kimbrell, John Palmer, Willie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kevin Herriott v. Alan Wilson
as 24-6348
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HERRIOTT, a/k/a Kevin Edward Herriott
Defendant:
ALAN WILSON, BRYAN STIRLING, JOHN PALMER and others
Jimmy Causey v. Charles Williams
as 24-6198
Plaintiff:
JIMMY H. CAUSEY
Defendant:
CHARLES WILLIAMS, MS. DAVIS, MS. CLOUD and others
Herriott v. Wilson et al
as 6:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Kevin E Herriott and Kevin Edward Herriott
Defendant:
Alan Wilson, Bryan Stirling, John Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Christopher Victoria v. Warden Palmer
as 24-6262
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LAMAR VICTORIA
Respondent:
WARDEN JOHN PALMER
Stanley v. Palmer et al
as 5:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Samuri Stanley
Defendant:
Warden John Palmer, EHSO John Doe, Captain Bibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Goodwin v. McCormick Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
Antonio Goodwin
Defendant:
McCormick Correctional Institution, John Palmer, Byron Bibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Victoria v. Palmer
as 5:2024cv00431
Petitioner:
Christopher Lamar Victoria
Respondent:
Warden John Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
