Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Daniels v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Joseph Anthony Daniels
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Joseph Anthony Daniels
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joseph Daniels v. Michael Gaither
as 22-6926
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTHONY DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL GAITHER, Medical Doctor, VINCENT GORE, Medical Doctor and B. ALEXANDER, Registered Nurse
Daniels v. Gaither et al
as 3:2022cv00526
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Daniels
Defendant:
Michael Gaither, Vincent Gore and B. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Clarke
as 3:2020cv00702
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel v. Session et al
as 1:2017cv21127
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Daniel
Defendant:
Jeff Session , Jeh Johnson and Scott Sutterfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Daniel v. United States Attorney General et al
as 6:2016cv01073
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Daniel
Defendant:
U S Attorney General, Secretary of Homeland Security and U S Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Daniel v. United States Attorney General, et al
as 1:2016cv22996
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Daniel
Defendant:
United States Attorney General , United States Secretary of Homeland Security and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joseph Daniel v. Hassel, et al
as 15-11579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTHONY DANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT HASSEL and DOCTORS CARE
Daniel v. Zainer et al
as 1:2014cv03532
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Daniel
Defendant:
Perry Zainer, Craig Feliccia, Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
