Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bynum v. Milyard, et al
as 12-1038
Petitioner - Appellant:
CECIL BYNUM
Respondent - Appellee:
MILYARD, KAREN P. ADKISSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
James Roane, et al v. Karen Tandy, et al
as 12-5020
Plaintiff - Appellee:
James H. Roane, Richard Tipton and Cory Johnson
Movant - Appellant:
Jeffrey Paul
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Bruce Webster, Anthony Battle and Orlando Hall
Defendant - Appellee:
Karen P. Tandy, Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration, Harley G. Lappin, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Newton E. Kendig, II, Medical Director, Health Services Division, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Veach, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary Terre Haute
Banks v. Marantz et al
as 1:2011cv01753
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
Marantz, T. Blumm, DONNA ZICKEFOOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Marantz et al
as 1:2011cv00475
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Marantz, T. Blumm, Donna Zickefoose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Price v. Lucas et al
as 1:2009cv00118
Plaintiff:
Herman P. Price
Defendant:
Lee Lucas, Robert Cross, Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Telfair v. Karen Tandy, et al
as 08-4663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS TELFAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN P. TANDY, Administrator-Drug Enforcement Administration, GERARD P. MCALEER, Director/Senior Officer-DEA: Newark, RAY MCCARTHY, Robbery-Homicide, OIC Newark and others
TELFAIR v. TANDY et al
as 2:2008cv00731
Plaintiff:
TOMMIE H. TELFAIR
Defendant:
KAREN P. TANDY, GERARD P. MCALEER, 1-50 UNKNOWN DEA AGENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GON v. GONZALEZ et al
as 1:2007cv01308
Petitioner:
ZHENLI YE GON
Respondent:
ALBERTO GONZALEZ, KAREN P. TANDY, SUPERINTENDENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
