Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Walker v. Department of Correction et al
as 1:2023cv06383
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walker
Defendant:
Department of Correction, New York City and Unnamed Persons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Brown v. Cheryl Strange, et al
as 23-35145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY TYREE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL STRANGE, Secretary of Corrections, STEPHEN SINCLAIR, in their individual and official capacities, SCOTT J. RUSSEL, Deputy Secretary of Corrections and others
Brown v. Strange et al
as 4:2022cv05094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyree Brown
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Stephen Sinclair, Scott Russel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copeland-Frazier v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv05015
Plaintiff:
Elijah J Copeland-Frazier and Gabriel Nevarez
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Washington State Penitentiary, Walla Walla County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv07887
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walker
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. Newsom
as 4:2020cv07154
Petitioner:
Kevin Walker Jones
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Bick et al
as 4:2020cv05538
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph Bick, J Walsh, Warden J. Lozano and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walker Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. HOUSTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 5:2020cv00168
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WALKER
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. CDCR Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison et al
as 4:2020cv02268
Defendant:
Dr. Bick, Correctional Officer Lozano, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walker Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Diaz et al
as 4:2020cv02208
Defendant:
Nortell, Jimenez, Penyate and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walker Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
