Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Orr v. Mehrtens et al
as 3:2023cv02054
Plaintiff:
John L. Orr, IV
Defendant:
Sharon R. Mehrtens, Dr Marie Walker, Dr. Daniel Loiterstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv02055
Plaintiff:
John L Orr
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr v. Mehrtens
as 3:2023cv01974
Plaintiff:
John L. Orr, IV
Defendant:
Sharon R. Mehrtens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr v. Walker
as 3:2016cv00178
Plaintiff:
John L. Orr, IV
Defendant:
Dr. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DePonceau v. United States of America
as 10-3539
Defendant:
K. Hollenbeck, Elmira Correctional Facility, Claire White, Assistant District Attorney, John R. Schwartz, Rochester City Court Judge and others
Appellee:
Edward Arenzer, Eliot L. Spitzer, David T. Moore, Rochester Police Chief and others
Appellant:
John J. Connell, Monroe County Judge
Plaintiff:
Victor Altheus DePonceau
Michael Shavers v. Catherine Bauman, et al
as 10-1817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHAVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHERINE BAUMAN, Warden, M. RONDEAU, Sergeant, T. JOHNSTON, Corrections Officer and others
Deponceau v. United States of America et al
as 9:2010cv00338
Plaintiff:
Victor Altheus DePonceau
Defendant:
United States of America, New York State, Monroe County and others
Deponceau v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv02150
Plaintiff:
Victor Altheus Deponceau
Defendant:
United States of America, New York State, Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shavers #378021 v. Bauman et al
as 2:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
Michael Shavers #378021
Defendant:
Catherine Bauman, M. Rondeau, T. Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
