Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Barnette v. Polk et al
as 0:2023cv04240
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lamont Barnette, Mont Barnette and Lamont Barnette
Defendant:
Neddie L. Polk and Tammy Snipes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Clifford Reid v. Warden, et al
as 18-12168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD LEON REID
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, Individual Capacity, Warden and ICT Member, FL. Dept of Corr Employee, J. A. PARRISH, Individual Capacity, Head of Classification and ICT Member, FL. Dept of Corr Employee, LAURIE L. OWENS and others
William Morrison, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 17-15022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM T. MORRISON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COLUMBIA CI WARDEN, RANDY L. POLK and others
Polk v. CO Compian et al
as 2:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
James L. Polk
Defendant:
CO Compian, CO Borrego, Muode St and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Palmer et al
as 3:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Anthony Markiece Jackson
Defendant:
John Palmer, Julie Jones, Eric Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helmes v. Marceus et al
as 3:2015cv00419
Petitioner:
Maurice Antwayne Helmes
Respondent:
P. Marceus, Trek McCullough and R. L. Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HELMES v. MARCEUS et al
as 4:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ANTWAYNE HELMES
Defendant:
P MARCEUS, TREK MCCULLOUGH, C GONAZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nash v. Vaughn et al
as 1:2012cv03387
Petitioner:
Yakitori T. Nash
Respondent:
D. N. Vaughn, N. L. Polk, W. D. Strickland and others
Kirk Williams v. State of California, et al
as 12-16603
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, LASSEN COUNTY and others
Robert Polk v. Fayette County Detention Cente, et al
as 12-5232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. POLK
Defendant - Appellee:
FAYETTE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS MEDICAL SERVICE, et al
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
