Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Lane v. West Virginia Dept. of Correctional Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Charles Lane
Defendant:
West Virginia Dept. of Correctional Rehabilitation and U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eskridge et al v. West Virginia Dept. of Correctional Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Billy Mason Eskridge, Bryant Carr and Charles Lane
Defendant:
West Virginia Dept. of Correctional Rehabilitation and U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Ames
as 3:2021cv00618
Petitioner:
Alan L. Hicks and Alan Lane Hicks
Respondent:
Donnie Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Damron v. Major D. J. et al
as 5:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jonathan T. Damron, Randy Howerton, Brandon Michel Lane and others
Defendant:
Southern Regional Jail and Correctional Center, Sgt. Cox, Corp. Sturgil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Major D. J. et al
as 5:2021cv00115
Defendant:
Corp. Mitchum, Corp. Hanes, Corp. Pack and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michel Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Major D. J. et al
as 5:2021cv00114
Defendant:
Corp. Mitchum, Corp. Hanes, Corp. Pack and others
Plaintiff:
Floyd Michel Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
C. L. v. Wilson et al
as 1:2019cv00792
Defendant:
Lieutenant Scott Hall, David R. Wilson, Correctional Officer Chelsea Ryder and others
Plaintiff:
C. L.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lane v. Francis
as 5:2019cv00176
Plaintiff:
Eugene Lane
Defendant:
Mr. Francis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Mcoy et al
as 5:2019cv00132
Plaintiff:
Eugene Lane
Defendant:
Officer Mcoy, Southern Regional Jail and James MaCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Bishop
as 5:2019cv00135
Plaintiff:
Eugene Lane
Defendant:
Greg Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
