Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Thompson v. Hicks et al
as 5:2024cv00829
Defendant:
Jason M Hicks, Carrie Hixon and Ashley Nuckolls
Plaintiff:
Donell Thompson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loveless v. Grady County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2024cv00594
Defendant:
Grady County District Attorney, Grady County Sheriff's Department, Jim Peek and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Elroy Loveless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Hicks
as 3:2024cv00344
Petitioner:
Waytayha Scott
Respondent:
Tikki M. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HICKS v. CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION WARDENS et al
as 4:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M HICKS
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION WARDENS, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR and CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loveless v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2022cv00994
Petitioner:
Chris Elroy Loveless
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Jason M Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loveless v. Peek et al
as 5:2022cv00941
Plaintiff:
Chris Elroy Loveless
Defendant:
Jim Peek, Jason M Hicks and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARRETT v. HICK et al
as 1:2020cv00137
Defendant:
MAJOR GRIFFIN, WARDEN M HICKS, F WOOD and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BARRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. HICKS et al
as 3:2020cv06697
Defendant:
T. PHILLIPS, DAVE RICHARDS, OFC. PINTO and others
Plaintiff:
SHAKEEM T. BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galvan v. Lucas et al
as 1:2018cv00688
Plaintiff:
Evan P. Galvan
Defendant:
A. Lucas, M. Hicks, T. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. USA
as 3:2015cv00644
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Pierre M. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
