Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hamlin v. Horn et al
as 1:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Hamlin
Defendant:
Sgt. Matthew Horn, Mercer County Commission, City of Princeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose et al v. Jividen et al
as 5:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Rose, Edward L Harmon and Edward L. Harmon
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Michael Francis, Larry Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skeens v. King
as 1:2020cv00749
Respondent:
Mercer County and Timothy King
Petitioner:
William Parris Skeens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mercer v. Ballard et al
as 2:2015cv01912
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Mercer
Defendant:
David Ballard, John R. Anderson, David Hummel, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prokop v. Mercer County et al
as 1:2014cv24375
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Prokop
Defendant:
Mercer County and State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kanode v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2013cv16360
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Kanode, Sr.
Defendant:
State of West Virginia and Mercer County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercer v. Ballard
as 2:2012cv00040
Petitioner:
Edward J. Mercer
Respondent:
Warden David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00994
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Kanode v. Boggess et al
as 1:2010cv00407
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Kanode, Sr.
Defendant:
Timothy D. Boggess, Southern Regional Drug and Violent Crime Task Force, State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kanode v. Swope, et al
as 1:2009cv01530
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Kanode, Sr.
Defendant:
Derek C. Swope, Scott Ash, Mike L. Gills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
