Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Murphy v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02117
Petitioner:
Boris Murphy
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Icker v. Grimaldo et al
as 5:2024ct03086
Plaintiff:
Mark Eric Icker
Defendant:
G. Grimaldo, C. Newsom, Mr. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bachert v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2024ct03022
Plaintiff:
Chester Bachert
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, Todd Ishee, Lamont Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. PAGE et al
as 1:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAVERNE MURPHY
Defendant:
SAM PAGE, OFFICER LUCAS, OFFICER KENNETH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Schuller
as 3:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Iesha C Murphy
Defendant:
FNU Schuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAVERNE MURPHY
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, SAM PAGE, OFFICER LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Dance
as 5:2023ct03238
Plaintiff:
Christopher Maurice Murphy
Defendant:
Sergeant Dance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oxendine v. Moose et al
as 5:2023ct03196
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Oxendine
Defendant:
Timothy D. Moose, Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00377
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LAVERNE MURPHY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
