Cases 1 - 10 of 199
Allen v. Windom et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00296
Defendant:
Mary B. Windom, Officer Menclheim, Officer Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Calvin Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Greene v. Pipes et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Raymond Shane Greene
Defendant:
Wesley S. Pipes, Mary B. Windom, Mark S. Tunstall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newby v. Grantham et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ricardo Newby
Defendant:
Madison Grantham, Mary B. Roberson and Steven T. Speakman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01687
Petitioner:
Ana Marie Hernandez
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Windom et al
as 5:2023cv01733
Plaintiff:
Henry Clay Smith, .
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Mary B Windom and Jennifer M Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Subel v. Ganey et al
as 1:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Carlos Jack Subel
Defendant:
Brenda Q. Ganey, Jody W. Bishop, Kristi Deason Hagood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horsman v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
William W Horsman, III
Defendant:
Hon. John Doe, Hon. Tom Doe, Hon. Harry Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullough v. Butler County Commission, Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Melissa McCullough
Defendant:
Butler County Commission, Alabama, Danny Bond, Stephen Lofton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calloway v. Garrett
as 7:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Suzzett Marie Calloway
Respondent:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
