Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Dakota
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wisham v. State of North Dakota et al
as 1:2021cv00137
Respondent: Attorney General, State of North Dakota and United States
Petitioner: Derek Matthew Wisham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knowles v. Hochhalter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00251
Defendant: Clare R. Hochhalter, Daniel L. Hovland, Matthew A. Sagsveen and others
Plaintiff: Efrain Reyes Knowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Sayler
as 1:2019cv00259
Petitioner: Antonio Raheem Matthews
Respondent: James Sayler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. Braun We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00175
Petitioner: Antonio Raheem Matthews
Respondent: Colby Braun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Olson v. USA
as 3:2018cv00015
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Matthew John Olson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wisham v. North Dakota, State of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00263
Petitioner: Derek Matthew Wisham
Defendant: Colby Braun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Defries v. Redmann
as 3:2012cv00018
Petitioner: Matthew Allyn Defries
Respondent: Don Redmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crabtree v. State of North Dakota
as 1:2009cv00045
Petitioner: Matthew Crabtree
Respondent: State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demarais v. Bureau of Indian Affairs et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00032
Plaintiff: Lane Matthew Demarais
Defendant: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Three Affiliated Tribes, Fort Berthold Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sjothun v. USA
as 3:2007cv00091
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Matthew Sjothun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?