Cases 1 - 10 of 36
CRAIG v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv03608
Plaintiff:
RUBEN R. CRAIG, III
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, JOHN TERRA, DEPUTY WYNDHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEDINA v. DET. SAL APRILE et al
as 5:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OMAR MEDINA
Defendant:
ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPT, DET. SAL APRILE, SGT. ERIC STAUFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEDINA v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OMAR MEDINA
Defendant:
GEORGE M. LITTLE, MONIQUE SAVAGE, JAKIE WOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEDINA v. JONES et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
MARIO MEDINA
Defendant:
OFFICER JONES, SERGEANT WINGER, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
MEDINA v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2020cv05767
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JUAN MEDINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MEDINA v. REICHLEY et al
as 5:2020cv05734
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MEDINA
Defendant:
ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JUDGE DOUGLAS G. REICHLEY, ATTORNEY SEAN POLL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES-MEDINA v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 5:2020cv05712
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Petitioner:
JOSE FLORES-MEDINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lora et al v. Baylor et al
as 1:2020cv01787
Plaintiff:
Justin Coate, Howard Wolfe, Jhon Lora and others
Defendant:
Lt. Baylor, George Warden, Mr. Armond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEDINA v. HALLMAN et al
as 5:2020cv02426
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OMAR MEDINA
Defendant:
ALFRED HALLMAN, KYLE RUSSELL and DOUGLAS METTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz-Medina v. Bradley et al
as 1:2019cv02133
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Ortiz-Medina
Defendant:
E. Bradley and FNU Bodge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
