Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Damien Mikell v. Louis Folino, et al
as 17-1049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN MIKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, Fomer Superintendent 2, ROBERT GILMORE, Former Superintendent 1, JEFFREY R. ROGERS, Corrections Classifiation adn Program Manager and others
Nathan Riley v. Abubakar Muhammad, et al
as 16-2366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN RILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ABUBAKAR MUHAMMAD, ALEDA MENCHYK, FOOD SERVICE MANAGER WALLACE DITTSWORTH and others
MIKELL v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2014cv01112
Plaintiff:
DAMIEN MIKELL
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, ROBERT GILMORE, JEFFREY ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RILEY et al v. MUHAMMAD et al
as 2:2014cv00547
Plaintiff:
NATHAN RILEY
Defendant:
ABUBAKAR MUHAMMAD, ALEDA MENCHYK, WALLACE DITTSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley et al v. Muhammad et al
as 3:2013cv02766
Plaintiff:
Nathan Riley and Alejambra Tilley
Defendant:
Abubakar Muhammad, Aleda Menchyk, Wallace Dittsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathan Riley v. Decarlo, et al
as 12-3983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN RILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL DECARLO, Correctional Food Service Manager 1
RILEY v. DECARLO et al
as 2:2011cv00537
Plaintiff:
NATHAN RILEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL DECARLO , WALLACE DITTSWORTH , JEFF ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. City and County of San Francisco Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2008cv04508
Plaintiff:
Michael DeCarlo Wright
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco Sheriff's Department, San Francisco Medical Department, S.F. Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
