Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Lewis v. Lyon et al
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Lewis
Defendant:
Michael Lyon, Michaela Merrill and Chantel Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Poulos v. Annucci
as 23-324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyson Poulos
Defendant / Appellee:
Steven Grimaldi, "John" Gordon, Mark Ross, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Christopher Miller, Jared Lachance and others
Lyon v. Attorney General California
as 2:2022at00833
Petitioner:
Michael Lyon
Respondent:
Attorney General California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lyon v. State of California
as 2:2022cv01417
Petitioner:
Michael Lyon
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of California and State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murray v. County of Albany et al
as 9:2022cv00592
Plaintiff:
Michael Murray
Defendant:
County of Albany, Sheriff Craig Apple, Superintendent Michael Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffey v. Lyon
as 2:2021cv00222
Petitioner:
Gregory Coffey
Defendant:
Michael Lyon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lyon v. Chemung County Jail
as 1:2021cv00857
Plaintiff:
Michael Lyon
Defendant:
Chemung County Jail and William A Schrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Michael Lyon
as 1:2021cv06120
Plaintiff:
Michael Lyon
Defendant:
Chemung County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sumpter v. Albany County et al
as 9:2020cv00619
Defendant:
Correction Officer Joe "Doe", Albany County Sheriff's Department, Employees/Supervisors John Does 1 and 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Kosnick Sumpter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cepeda et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv03483
Plaintiff:
willie murray, jeffrey simon, j'von johnson and others
Defendant:
C.O. Joseph Moore, Lt Mark Valvo, C.O. Jarred Jarosz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
