Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Garrett v. Wiater et al
as 1:2023cv04916
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamont Garrett
Defendant:
M. Wiater, Schmif, Mirelies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donaldson et al v. City of Dayton Ohio Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Ora Joseph Donaldson, Jr and Patricia Hammer
Defendant:
City of Dayton Ohio Police Department, Timmy Battley, Officer Jeremy Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bradley v. Mires et al
as 3:2022cv05806
Plaintiff:
Antonio Julius Bradley, Sr
Defendant:
Brandon Mires, Sylvester Weaver and Bret Terwilliger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isaac Washington v. Leon Bolling, et al
as 22-11345
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISAAC WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
LEON BOLLING, ANGELA MIREE, CORIZEN HEALTH and others
Moss v. Cutts et al
as 7:2021cv01468
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lamar Moss
Defendant:
Andrew Cutts and T. Miree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2021cv00333
Defendant:
John Hutton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Miree and others
Plaintiff:
James Kelly Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Dees v. Lamar et al
as 2:2020cv01326
Defendant:
Richardson, O Walker, Tomlin and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bolling et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00853
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, B. Gadson, K Speaks and others
Plaintiff:
DeMarqueis Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Correctional Officer Cunningham, Kenneth Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Ladarius Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
