Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Martinez v. Kahl et al
as 8:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Adrian Gutierrez Martinez
Defendant:
Larry W. Kahl, Don Whitmire, Kris Boe Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. USA
as 8:2021cv00248
Petitioner:
Kevin Mitchell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bogenreif v. Frakes et al
as 4:2019cv03101
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Mitchell L Bogenreif
Respondent:
Department of Correctional Services, Scott R. Frakes and State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
West v. Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv03064
Defendant:
Brad Johnson, Robert Mitchell and Andrew Truslow
Plaintiff:
Troy Lee West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. USA
as 4:2016cv03114
Petitioner:
Cameron Mitchell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mitchell v. Kohl et al
as 4:2015cv03087
Defendant:
Dan Danaher, Christina Fergenson, Gary Hustad and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Mitchell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quevedo-Andretti v. Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 8:2015cv00031
Defendant:
Tylynn Bauer, Kristine Boesimmons, Stephanie Bright and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro D. Quevedo-Andretti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Bergevin et al
as 4:2012cv03033
Defendant:
Lynn Beideck and Jason Bergevin
Plaintiff:
Cameron Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Wagner et al
as 4:2011cv03213
Defendant:
Lynn R. Beideak, John Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Houston
as 4:2009cv03174
Petitioner:
Earl Mitchell, Jr.
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
