Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Normand v. T. Weber B.
as 4:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Mark Eric Normand
Defendant:
T. Weber B.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simonaj v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv10322
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick Brian Garland, Secretary, USDHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Acting Director Patrick J. Lechleitner and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Simonaj
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patrick Lechleitner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 hb Removal - Petition of Habeas Corpus
Normand v. Tensas Parish Detention Center
as 3:2023cv01135
Plaintiff:
David Normand
Defendant:
Tensas Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Whittington et al
as 5:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Andrew White
Defendant:
Julian Whittington, Lt Evans, Deputy Crook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Virece v. Normand
as 5:2023cv00481
Plaintiff:
John C Virece
Defendant:
Sgt Normand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorley v. Normand
as 5:2022cv00062
Petitioner:
Garsumo Pee Dorley
Respondent:
T Normand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bedford-Beaulieu v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2022cv00359
Petitioner:
Normand Bedford-Beaulieu
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Normand v. F C I Oakdale
as 2:2022cv02005
Plaintiff:
Louis Normand
Defendant:
Warden F C I Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Adcock v. Bossier Parish et al
as 5:2022cv01496
Plaintiff:
Lane Tyler Adcock
Defendant:
Sheriff Dept of Bossier City, Sgt Normand, Deputy Porteau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Normand v. Landry et al
as 2:2022cv01470
Plaintiff:
Brandon Travis Normand
Defendant:
Donald D. Landry and Royale L. Colbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
