Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Noriega v. North Carolina State
as 5:2024hc02183
Respondent:
North Carolina State
Petitioner:
Francisco Noriega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Rutledge v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine
as 24-6649
Defendant:
CAROL MILLIGAN, CHERYL BUSHMELL, JASON REID, Ex Deputy and others
Plaintiff:
A.D.R., A.M.R. and CHRISTOPHER R. RUTLEDGE
Jerry Sharpe v. North Carolina State
as 24-6162
Petitioner:
JERRY L. SHARPE
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE
Floyd et al v. North Carolina State et al
as 5:2022ct03203
Plaintiff:
Tanis Floyd and Robert H. Wolfe
Defendant:
North Carolina State and Franklin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe v. North Carolina State et al
as 5:2022ct03199
Plaintiff:
Howard H. Wolfe
Defendant:
North Carolina State and Franklin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown-Bey v. State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2021cv00247
Petitioner:
Eddricco L. Brown-Bey
Respondent:
North Carolina, State of, Milton Oliver Fletcher, North Carolina Division of Adult Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Davis et al
as 5:2021ct03263
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Franklin Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Chris Davis, Anthony Collins, Pamlico County Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swanson v. North Carolina State
as 5:2021cv00066
Petitioner:
Holden Scott Swanson
Respondent:
North Carolina State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Webb v. North Carolina State Highway Patrol
as 5:2020ct03326
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel R. Webb
Defendant:
North Carolina State Highway Patrol, Unknown Trooper, Trooper Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAISON EL v. BEAVER et al
as 1:2018cv00960
Respondent:
Kenneth Beaver, NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF and JOSH STEIN
Petitioner:
STEVEN FAISON EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
