Cases 1 - 10 of 82
PEAVY v. BARBER et al
as 5:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PEAVY and MIKHAI AL-QUADI
Defendant:
BARBER, HUBBARD, K JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEAVY v. DIXON
as 3:2023cv17188
Petitioner:
MICHAEL PEAVY
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brent Jacoby v. Peavy, et al
as 23-12075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT JACOBY
Defendant / Appellee:
PEAVY, in their individual capacity and BORDERS, in their individual capacity
Peavy v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Peavy
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Patrick Dowd, South Bend City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peavy v. Wellpath et al
as 3:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Peavy
Defendant:
Well Path, Olmstead, William J Redmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEAVY v. USA
as 3:2023cv00103
Petitioner:
KEVIN A PEAVY, JR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brent Jacoby v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-14150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT JACOBY
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MONICA MCCOY, Warden, CARTER and others
BARKER v. LAMB et al
as 1:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
DEKELDRICK BARKER
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEWIS LAMB, ADA TAMMY OWENS PEAVY, JUDGE JIMMIE BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacoby v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00843
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Monica McCoy, Warden Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWEN v. SUMTER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE et al
as 1:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
TONY MICHAEL OWEN
Defendant:
SUMTER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE and TAMI PEAVY OWEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
