Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Tyrone Morgan v. Doctor Poorman, et al
as 24-11655
Plaintiff:
TYRONE M. MORGAN
Defendant:
DOCTOR POORMAN, ADAM PYLITT and FRANK MIGILIORE
Morgan v. Poorman et al
as 8:2022cv02749
Plaintiff:
Tyrone M. Morgan
Defendant:
Doctor Poorman, Adam Pylitt and Frank Migiliore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyree Tyquan Moy v. Kevin DeParlos, et al
as 22-1723
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYREE TYQUAN MOY
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN DEPARLOS, BRAD SHOEMAKER, RYAN BARNES and others
Jess Brasuell, III v. San Luis Obispo County Jail, et al
as 22-55316
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESS D. BRASUELL III
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY JAIL, SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES, Custody Division Deputies and Staff, official capacity and others
Green v. Poorman et al
as 1:2020cv00085
Defendant:
Shukriya Jenkins, Lt. Gregory Esposito and Phillip Poorman
Plaintiff:
Cary Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Moy v. DeParlos et al
as 1:2018cv01575
Defendant:
Ryan Barnes, Doctor Keenan, Kevin DeParlos and others
Plaintiff:
Tyree Tyquan Moy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poorman v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2018cv01272
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Marie Poorman
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Horrox, et al
as 8:2017cv00295
Plaintiff:
Grady Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald Horrox, Jill Poorman and Bernie McCabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchinson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00914
Plaintiff:
Tiant T. Hutchinson
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Poorman, Stokley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herron v. Poorman et al
as 8:2010cv00363
Plaintiff:
Trenton M. Herron
Defendant:
Jill Poorman and Mary Ann Casp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
