Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Washington v. State of Texas
as 24-40205
Plaintiff:
Jacque Kenshashwa Washington
Defendant:
State of Texas, City of Freeport, Texas, Brazoria County Court at Law No. 4 and others
Chapman v. Decker et al
as 3:2023cv03200
Plaintiff:
John P. Chapman
Defendant:
Officer Decker, Sergeant Rickert, Sgt. Haring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatmon v. Warden Rickert
as 1:2023cv00623
Petitioner:
Alton Chatmon
Respondent:
Warden Rickert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(PC) Brown v. Bugge et al
as 2:2022cv02118
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Brown
Defendant:
B Bugge, J Rickert, B. Bugge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander, Robert v. Bender, Molly et al
as 3:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Alexander
Defendant:
CO Molly Bender, CO Curtis L. Visser, CO Collin D. Visser and others
Not Classified By Court:
DCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson, Lamar v. Novak, Sue et al
as 3:2020cv00901
Defendant:
Sgt. Rohwer, T. Anderson, RN Valarius and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Anderson
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. USP LEWISBURG et al
as 1:2019cv01380
Defendant:
C. Moore, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. Earp, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER B. Mississigan and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy N. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. USP LEWISBURG et al
as 2:2019cv03537
Defendant:
C. MOORE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. EARP, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. HURLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY N. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rickert v. Carlson
as 1:2017cv09249
Plaintiff:
Quinn Rickert
Defendant:
Terry Carlson and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shablesky v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Jonathon M. Shablesky
Defendant:
Barry Stanford, John Stanback, Sarah Rickert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
