Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ferrell v. Bedford County Jail
as 4:2017cv00056
Plaintiff:
Ronald Franklin Ferrell
Defendant:
Bedford County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Bacon v. Reetika Kumar, et al
as 16-16909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD FRANKLIN BACON
Defendant - Appellee:
REETIKA KUMAR, M.D., JOHN CHOKATOS, M.D., LAWRENCE GAMBOA, M.D. and others
Charles W. Windham v. Ronald Franklin et al
as 2:2016cv05888
Defendant:
Ascurate, H. T. Brown, M. A. Buechter and others
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Windham
Franklin v. NYC Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv05548
Plaintiff:
Ronald Franklin
Defendant:
NYC Department of Corrections, Joseph Ponte, Maxsolaine Mingo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles W. Windham v. Ronald Franklin et al
as 2:2016cv04375
Defendant:
Ascurate, H. T. Brown, M. A. Buechter and others
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Windham
Bacon v. Beard et al
as 3:2015cv04477
Plaintiff:
Ronald Franklin Bacon
Defendant:
Jeffery Beard, W. Muniz, Kumar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Windham v. Ronald Franklin, et al
as 14-56258
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES W. WINDHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD FRANKLIN, Prison Guard Sergeant, individually, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), PAGAN, C. SPENCER and others
Charles Windham v. Ronald Franklin, et al
as 14-55820
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES W. WINDHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD FRANKLIN, Prison Guard Sergeant, individually, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), PAGAN, C. SPENCER and others
Charles Windham v. Ronald Franklin et al
as 2:2013cv03004
Defendant:
Ms Assad, Miguel Enriquez, Ronald Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Windham
FRANKLIN v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2012cv06239
Petitioner:
RONALD FRANKLIN
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
