Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Miller v. Naughton
as 3:2019cv00186
Plaintiff:
Raymond Miller
Defendant:
Martin Naughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. United States of America
as 4:2015cv00363
Petitioner:
Byron Raymond Miller
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Blackfeather v. Wheeler, et al
as 15-1094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICAH JAMES BLACKFEATHER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTY WHEELER, JASON KORN, DAVID KENNEDY and others
William Miller, II v. USA
as 15-10861
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM RAYMOND MILLER, II
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Miller, II v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv01044
Petitioner:
William Raymond Miller, II
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Verser v. Turner et al
as 1:2010cv07451
Plaintiff:
Glenn Verser
Defendant:
Leslie Turner, Raymond Miller, Terry McCann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Miller v. Hallie Jones, et al
as 10-5282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
HALLIE JONES, LINDA TIMBERLAKE, Mail Room Clerks at KSR, J. DAVID DONAHUE, Warden and others
Defendant:
ROB ATKIN, Grievance Coordinator at KSR
Verser v. Ghosh et al
as 1:2010cv00409
Plaintiff:
Glenn Verser
Defendant:
Parth Ghosh, Nurse Tonya, A Halline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Miracle et al
as 1:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Raymond Miller
Defendant:
Timothy Miracle, Ohio Adult Parole Authority and Lakewood Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROTH v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2009cv04140
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ROTH
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY A. BEARD and RAYMOND MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
